Mixing buffers and pass transistors in FPGA routing architectures

  • Authors:
  • Mike Sheng;Jonathan Rose

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G4;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G4

  • Venue:
  • FPGA '01 Proceedings of the 2001 ACM/SIGDA ninth international symposium on Field programmable gate arrays
  • Year:
  • 2001

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The routing architecture of an FPGA consists of the length of the wires, the type of switch used to connect wires (buffered, unbuffered, fast or slow) and the topology of the interconnection of the switches and wires. FPGA routing architecture has a major influence on the logic density and speed of FPGA devices. Previ冒ous work [] based on a 0.35um CMOS process has suggested that an architecture consisting of length 4 wires (where the length of a wire is measured in terms of the number of logic blocks it passes before being switched) and half of the programmable switches are active buffers, and half are pass transistors. In that work, however, the topology of the routing architecture prevented buffered tracks from connecting to pass-transistor tracks. This restriction prevents the creation of interconnection trees for high fanout nets that have a mixture of buffers and pass transistors. Electrical simulations sug冒gest that connections closer to the leaves on interconnection trees are faster using pass transistors, but it is essential to buffer closer to the source. This latter effect is well known in regular ASIC routing [2].In this work we propose a new routing architecture that allows liberal switching between buffered and pass transistor tracks. We explore various versions of the architecture to determine the den冒sity-speed trade-off. We show that one version of the new architec冒ture results in FPGAs with 10% faster critical path delay yet uses the same area as the previous architecture that does not allow such switching. We also show that the new architecture allows a useful area-speed trade off and several versions of the new architecture result in FPGAs with 8% gain in area-delay product than the previ冒ous architecture that does not allow the switching.