Testability of 2-Level AND/EXOR Circuits

  • Authors:
  • Rolf Drechsler;Harry Hengster;Horst Schäfer;Joachim Hartmann;Bernd Becker

  • Affiliations:
  • Institute of Computer Science, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg/Breisgau, Germany;Institute of Computer Science, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg/Breisgau, Germany;Department of Computer Science, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany;DACOS Software GmbH, Neue Bahnhofstr. 21 St. Ingbert, Germany;Institute of Computer Science, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg/Breisgau, Germany

  • Venue:
  • Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications
  • Year:
  • 1999

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

It is often stated that AND/EXOR circuits are much easier to test than AND/OR circuits. This statement, however, only holds true for circuits derived from restricted classes of AND/EXOR expressions, like positive polarity Reed-Muller and fixed polarity Reed-Muller expressions. For these two classes of expressions, circuits with good deterministic testability properties are known. In this paper we show that these circuits also have good random pattern testability attributes. An input probability distribution is given that yields a short expected test length for biased random patterns. This is the first time theoretical results on random pattern testability are presented for 2-level AND/EXOR circuit realizations of arbitrary Boolean functions. It turns out that analogous results cannot be expected for less restricted classes of 2-level AND/EXOR circuits. We present experiments demonstrating that generally minimized 2-level AND/OR circuits can be tested as easy (or hard) as minimized 2-level AND/EXOR circuits.