Experimental analysis of different techniques for bounded model checking

  • Authors:
  • Nina Amla;Robert Kurshan;Kenneth L. McMillan;Ricardo Medel

  • Affiliations:
  • Cadence Design Systems;Cadence Design Systems;Cadence Design Systems;Stevens Institute of Technology

  • Venue:
  • TACAS'03 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Tools and algorithms for the construction and analysis of systems
  • Year:
  • 2003

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Bounded model checking (BMC) is a procedure that searches for counterexamples to a given property through bounded executions of a non-terminating system. This paper compares the performance of SAT-based, BDD-based and explicit state based BMC on benchmarks drawn from commercial designs. Our experimental framework provides a uniform and comprehensive basis to evaluate each of these approaches. The experimental results in this paper suggest that for designs with deep counterexamples, BDD-based BMC is much faster. For designs with shallow counterexamples, we observe that indeed SAT-based BMC is more effective than BDD-based BMC, but we also observe that explicit state based BMC is comparably effective, a new observation.