False-noise analysis using logic implications

  • Authors:
  • Alexey Glebov;Sergey Gavrilov;David Blaauw;Supamas Sirichotiyakul;Chanhee Oh;Vladimir Zolotov

  • Affiliations:
  • MicroStyle - Moscow, Russia;MicroStyle - Moscow, Russia;University of Michigan;Motorola Inc. Austin, TX;Motorola Inc. Austin, TX;Motorola Inc. Austin, TX

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design
  • Year:
  • 2001

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Cross-coupled noise analysis has become a critical concern in today's VLSI designs. Typically, noise analysis makes an assumption that all aggressing nets can simultaneously switch in the same direction. This creates a worst-case noise pulse on the victim net that often leads to false noise violations. In this paper, we present a new approach that uses logic implications to identify the maximum set of aggressor nets that can inject noise simultaneously under the logic constraints of the circuit. We propose an approach to efficiently generate logic implications from a transistor-level description and propagate them in the circuit using ROBDD representations and a newly proposed laterial propagation method. We then show that the problem of finding the worst case logically feasible noise can be represented as a maximum weighted independent set problem and show how to efficiently solve it. Initially, we restrict our discussion to zero-delay implications, which are valid for glitch-free circuits and then extend our approach to timed implications. The proposed approaches were implemented in an industrial noise analysis tool and results are shown for a number of industrial test cases. We demonstrate that a significant reduction in the number of noise failures can be obtained from considering the logic implications as proposed in this paper, underscoring the need for false-noise analysis.