A hybrid complete-graph partial-crossbar routing architecture for multi-FPGA systems

  • Authors:
  • Mohammed A. S. Khalid;Jonathan Rose

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, 10 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G4;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, 10 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G4

  • Venue:
  • FPGA '98 Proceedings of the 1998 ACM/SIGDA sixth international symposium on Field programmable gate arrays
  • Year:
  • 1998

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Multi-FPGA systems (MFSs) are used as custom computing machines, logic emulators and rapid prototyping vehicles. A key aspect of these systems is their programmable routing architecture; the manner in which wires, FPGAs and Field-Programmable Interconnect Devices (FPIDs) are connected. Several routing architectures for MFSs have been proposed [Arno92] [Butt92] [Hauc94] [Apti96] [Vuil96] and previous research has shown that the partial crossbar is one of the best existing architectures [Kim96] [Khal97]. In this paper we propose a new routing architecture, called the Hybrid Complete-Graph and Partial-Crossbar (HCGP) which has superior speed and cost compared to a partial crossbar. The new architecture uses both hard-wired and programmable connections between the FPGAs.We compare the performance and cost of the HCGP and partial crossbar architectures experimentally, by mapping a set of 15 large benchmark circuits into each architecture. A customized set of partitioning and inter-chip routing tools were developed, with particular attention paid to architecture-appropriate inter-chip routing algorithms. We show that the cost of the partial crossbar (as measured by the number of pins on all FPGAs and FPIDs required to fit a design), is on average 20% more than the new HCGP architecture and as much as 35% more. Furthermore, the critical path delay for designs implemented on the partial crossbar increased, and were on average 9% more than the HCGP architecture and up to 26% more.Using our experimental approach, we also explore a key architecture parameter associated with the HCGP architecture: the proportion of hard-wired connections versus programmable connections, to determine its best value.