Techniques for verifying superscalar microprocessors
DAC '96 Proceedings of the 33rd annual Design Automation Conference
Proceedings of the 36th annual ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
Proceedings of the 37th Annual Design Automation Conference
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL)
Boolean satisfiability with transitivity constraints
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL)
The small model property: how small can it be?
Information and Computation
Itanium Processor Microarchitecture
IEEE Micro
Bit-Level Abstraction in the Verfication of Pipelined Microprocessors by Correspondence Checking
FMCAD '98 Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design
Relating Multi-step and Single-Step Microprocessor Correctness Statements
FMCAD '02 Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design
Automatic Abstraction of Memories in the Formal Verification of Superscalar Microprocessors
TACAS 2001 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems
CHARME '99 Proceedings of the 10th IFIP WG 10.5 Advanced Research Working Conference on Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods
BDD Based Procedures for a Theory of Equality with Uninterpreted Functions
CAV '98 Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification
Formal Verification of VLIW Microprocessors with Speculative Execution
CAV '00 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification
Automatic verification of Pipelined Microprocessor Control
CAV '94 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification
Journal of Symbolic Computation
Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe - Volume 1
Efficient translation of boolean formulas to CNF in formal verification of microprocessors
Proceedings of the 2004 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference
Using positive equality to prove liveness for pipelined microprocessors
Proceedings of the 2004 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference
Comparative Study of Strategies for Formal Verification of High-Level Processors
ICCD '04 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design
Comparison of schemes for encoding unobservability in translation to SAT
Proceedings of the 2005 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference
Using Abstraction for Efficient Formal Verification of Pipelined Processors with Value Prediction
ISQED '06 Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design
A method for debugging of pipelined processors in formal verification by correspondence checking
Proceedings of the 2010 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference
Method for formal verification of soft-error tolerance mechanisms in pipelined microprocessors
ICFEM'10 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Formal engineering methods and software engineering
Automatic formal verification of liveness for pipelined processors with multicycle functional units
CHARME'05 Proceedings of the 13 IFIP WG 10.5 international conference on Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods
Integrating formal verification into an advanced computer architecture course
IEEE Transactions on Education
ICFEM'11 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Formal methods and software engineering
Automatic formal verification of multithreaded pipelined microprocessors
Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Design
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
We present a method for automatic formal verification of Digital Signal Processors (DSPs) that have VLIW architecture and reconfigurable functional units optimized for accelerating Software Defined Radio (SDR) applications to be used for future space communications by NASA. The formal verification was done with the highly automatic method of Correspondence Checking by exploiting the property of Positive Equality that allows a dramatic simplification of the solution space and many orders of magnitude speedup. The formal verification of a complex reconfigurable DSP took approximately 10 minutes of CPU time on a single workstation, when using our industrial-strength tool flow.