It's worth the hassle!: the added value of evaluating the usability of mobile systems in the field

  • Authors:
  • Christian Monrad Nielsen;Michael Overgaard;Michael Bach Pedersen;Jan Stage;Sigge Stenild

  • Affiliations:
  • NNIT A/S, Lyngby, Denmark;KMD A/S, Aalborg East, Denmark;ETI A/S, Nørresundby, Denmark;Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark;Guppyworks, København Ø, Denmark

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The distinction between field and laboratory is classical in research methodology. In human-computer interaction, and in usability evaluation in particular, it has been a controversial topic for several years. The advent of mobile devices has revived this topic. Empirical studies that compare evaluations in the two settings are beginning to appear, but they provide very different results. This paper presents results from an experimental comparison of a field-based and a lab-based usability evaluation of a mobile system. The two evaluations were conducted in exactly the same way. The conclusion is that it is definitely worth the hassle to conduct usability evaluations in the field. In the field-based evaluation we identified significantly more usability problems and this setting revealed problems with interaction style and cognitive load that were not identified in the laboratory.